Reay Jespersen

Behold, A Flying Danish Ninja!

Iron Man 2 - movie review

iron-man-21.jpg

SPOILER WARNING

Iron Man 2 opens by introducing a new villain: Whiplash, aka Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke), the son of a just-dead Russian engineer whose work on the arc reactor that powers Iron Man (and indeed, Tony Stark himself) was allegedly stolen by Tony Stark’s father. Vanko sets to work building a powered suit of his own, and hunts down Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) to get his revenge. The attempt proves short-lived, and he’s sent to prison.

For his own part, Stark is fending off attempts by the government - spearheaded by weapon design technician competitor to Stark, Justin Hammer (Sam Rockwell) - to obtain the Iron Man technology. Stark has also found out that he’s dying; the arc reactor that replaced his heart is leeching toxins into his body. He wants to keep it quiet from assistant/would-be love interest Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow), so transfers control of the Stark empire to her under the pretense of her being able run it more effectively. Enter Natalie Rushman (Scarlett Johansson), the overseer of the legal transfer of the company to Potts’ control, and now assistant to Potts.

Hammer, meanwhile, has faked Vanko’s death in order to spring him from prison and has put Vanko to work on Hammer’s own line of Iron Man-like suits, which Venko turns into robots.

As he faces his own mortality secretly, Stark’s behaviour becomes more erratic and dangerous, finally pushing his friend Lt. Col. James Rhodes (Don Cheadle) to take control of one of the Iron Man suits in order to keep Stark in check. As his downward spiral continues, Stark gets a wake-up call from the past in a recorded message from his father informing Stark that he alone has the key to finding something very important; something that will change the world. And something, as it turns out, that will also save his own life.

Woven into this, we find that Rushman isn’t just a rep from legal who can handle herself in a fight, but is in fact an undercover SHIELD agent working for Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson).

It’s only when Hammer’s robots are put into action at Hammer’s very public product launch that Vanko’s real plan is revealed.

Robert Downey Jr. does a good job in the revised role as Tony Stark, but the subplot of his tailspin of behaviour from knowing of his imminent death didn’t feel like it fit the character as well as it may have. Stark’s life has always been about complete control, so his acting out at losing control over his own life ending too soon makes some sense, but not to the degree he depicts. The result, which borders on too long, comes across as somewhat contrived.

Gwyneth Paltrow was more likable in the first movie, here having far fewer endearing moments, coming across instead as cold and uncaring. Granted, Stark’s unaccountable behaviour pushes her there to a point - to paraphrase her, she’s an assistant trying to run the company that Stark should be running - but it would’ve been nice to see her try to care for him more and distance herself less.

Scarlett Johansson was good, but felt like she was too downplayed. When she finally flies into glorious action during the movie’s climax (the fight choreography for her is quite well done), it’s all too brief a release from the prim and proper - though seductive - guise she’s held.

Don Cheadle’s Rhodes felt less friendly and more official than it perhaps should’ve (and may have, if Terrence Howard had been brought back to revise his performance as the character).

Sam Rockwell was good as Justin Hammer, but the character felt a bit two-dimensional.

Mickey Rourke was the real surprise here, putting on a performance which was not only noteworthy, but at its best, stole the show.

Overall, most performances weren’t what they could’ve/should’ve been, but the core idea of the story, the action, the other subplot of Tony re-discovering a new element as passed down to him by his father - that which will change the world and which literally gives him new life, and notched up presence/relevance of the Avengers all still make for an entertaining movie. It isn’t as good as the first on a number of levels, but is still worth seeing on a big screen by old and (like me) new Iron Man fans alike.

And yes, Virginia, there is a teaser after the credits. Worth sticking around for, though its snippit of a hint may be lost on those not at least passingly familiar with other Avengers.

8 Comments so far

  1. The Rob May 17th, 2010 8:45 am

    Nice review. Touched on most of the concerns I had with it, as well. I didn’t really care for Don Cheadle, but at least we didn’t have to endure Terrence Howard’s nasal whine for 2 more hours. The HUGE movie tie-ins at the end are starting to get less clever and more heavy-handed. Yeah, I know they need to generate buzz for the plethora of Marvel movies coming out (Thor, Captain America, Avengers), but make it a little more subtle (the Thor nod after the credits was good, the big folder stamped “AVENGERS PROJECT” was not). And WHAT THE FARK IS WRONG WITH AGENT COULSON? The guy is constantly bobbing left and right when he talks. He does it on “New Adventures of Old Christine” too….STAND STILL YOU TWITCHY MOFO!

  2. Reay May 17th, 2010 8:52 am

    @Rob - The Avengers folder hadn’t struck me as too heavy, but I do see your point. Just having a plain folder on Fury’s desk that Stark starts to flip through and see hints on about Avengers would perhaps have been better.

    And yeah, I liked the Thor hint, but there were people in the audience who saw it and were questioning what the hell it was they’d just seen. Perhaps that was too subtle, given how far and wide the audience reaches (including those who may never have heard of Thor).

  3. The Rob May 17th, 2010 1:34 pm

    Yeah! like maybe a bio of Steve Rogers, a post-it referring to Dr Bruce Banner, etc…no direct mention of Avengers, but just some teaser bits…

  4. David Scholes May 18th, 2010 3:45 am

    I rather liked the apperances of Thor’s hammer and Cap’s shield in the ending credits of IM2. I hought it was neat.

    Still I’m a Marvel fan boy from way back.

    If you get a chance check out some of my fan fiction:

    Just scroll down below my author profile and you will see over 40 fan fiction stories here:

    http://www.fanfiction.net/u/1276881/David_Scholes

    I’m also an Australian science fiction writer:

    http://www.StrategicBookPublishing.com/ScienceFictionandAlternateHistory.html

    http://www.amazon.com/Essential-Reading-Science-Fiction-Scholes/dp/1449581889/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1261366245&sr=1-1

    http://www.sffworld.com/community/story/3932p0.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yI_xoUYXwaw

    Cheers

  5. Alex May 18th, 2010 5:58 am

    We have some quite different opinions about parts of this movie - as a fan of older Iron Man comics, I remember a Tony Stark who was as much about the partying as about control, and have felt from the beginning that it was this Stark that Downey was channeling. From that perspective, his descent into more reckless behavior was pretty bang-on for me, and the drunken Iron Man scene was reminiscent of his battles with alcoholism that have been done well in the comics in the past.

    I agree about the ending, though - several people in the theater that I was in thought it was the head of one of Hammer’s robots sitting there. Which makes no sense since Coulson left before all of that happened… But they clearly didn’t get the Thor reference.

  6. The Rob May 18th, 2010 11:35 am

    They didn’t get the Thor ref? Philistines. They don’t deserve to partake of Marvel epics.

  7. Reay May 19th, 2010 4:27 am

    @David - Was Cap’s shield at the end, as well? I thought it was only shown earlier, when Stark (apparently obliviously) used it to prop up his particle accelerator. Anyway, thanks for the feedback. I’ll definitely check out your stuff.

  8. Reay May 19th, 2010 4:35 am

    @Alex - I hear you with the drunk angle - I thought it may’ve been a way to lead into his fighting booze, as well. But it was brief enough an element of the movie, something I think they’d likely steer clear of getting too far into (I think they’ve hooked enough kids into the series that they’d think twice about having an alcoholic hero, source material be damned), and the only instance of it I can recall in either movie… all leading me to wonder if it’s a set-up for darker times, or was a one-time, brief anomaly to depict his crazygonuts attitude to facing imminent death.
    Guess we’ll find out at some point. I noticed that Iron Man 3 already has an imdb slot. :)

Leave a reply

Mexico